INTRODUCTION
It is now widely accepted that market urban
economy is as much a social process as it is an territorial process. It
transforms societal organizations, the role of the family, demographic
structures, the nature of work, and the way we choose to live and with whom. It
also modifies domestic roles and relations within the family, and redefines
concepts of individual and social responsibility.
This diversity in living arrangements and
family composition in urban societies is also closely linked to shifts in the
world of work—in the urban economy and in occupations. Not only does
urbanization involve obvious changes in employment and working life, it alters
the relationships between households (the collective units of consumption) and
labor markets (the production sector). Individuals work and earn wages, but it is
households (and families) that spend those earnings. Thus, the composition of
families and households influences the changing well-being of the individuals
in those households as much as the occupational status of its members.
Market Urban
economics is broadly the economic study of urban areas; as such, it involves using
the tools of economics to analyze urban issues such as crime, education, public
transit, housing, and local government finance. More narrowly, it is a branch
of microeconomics that studies urban spatial structure
and the location of households and firms (Quigley 2008).
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
MARKET URBAN ECONOMY, FAMILY SIZE AND STRUCTURE AND WELFARE STATE
There
is a relationship between the family (size & structure), nature of welfare
state and economy. This is because the
structure of the economy and social system to a large extent determine the
welfare needs of a community – whether of a traditional farming or modern
market economy. Take for examples, in
some part of Nigeria where younger people get married to many wives at a younger
age and give birth to many children as they can without birth control, this has
a significant effect to their welfare needs.
The pre-colonial Nigerian rural communities were examples also of a
traditional farming community – they were basically rural and large family and
were required to cope with farm work.
Girls
were given out early in marriage and polygamy was encouraged and seen as a sign
influence. The welfare needs capable of sustaining such a social group in a
traditional farming economy are as follows;
(1)
Good
access road for the evacuation of farm produce
(2)
Establishment
of a primary health care centre
(3)
Provision
of agric – extension of services
(4)
Provision
of portable drinking water and
(5)
Primary
school
It is pertinent to note that this economy is characterized
largely by wage and labour, and small nuclear family size. It is also characterized these days with high
level of unemployment, skill redundancies and the attendant risk of social
exclusion thereby increasing the demand for social protection. However, growing influence of economic
liberalism has led to reduction in social protection and tighter control of
public expenditure.
As already noted, the male bread winner model
no longer describes adequately the relationship between the family/household
and the labour market. This is because,
women nowadays constitutes the a sizeable percentage of the labour market in
this economy.
The welfare state in such regimes can intervene
with strategies on behalf of women to encourage the provision of child care
facilities by employers of labour. This
will enable women take up gainful employment and stimulate the required
economic growth to sustain the welfare state and pay for its services. Other possible intervention by the state
involves retaining for new skills acquisition and periodic supply of food items
to the poor, redundant and retrenched workers.
The alternative in the absence of such state
intervention is for the women population to be constrained to react as follows:
1.
That
women substantially reduce their labour market involvement by staying at home
to look after their children and this will spell hardship for the family as it
will reduce their earning power.
Note
that the family in an urban market economy lives on earned salaries and
wages. House rent must be paid as at
when due. Food has to be bought,
vehicles serviced and children’s school fees paid.
2.
The other implication is that the resultant
exclusion and reduction in the female workforce will reduce the National Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) OR
3.
That
women reduce their fertility rate by either delaying child bearing or reducing
the frequency of child birth. This in
turn reduce averages family size and affects the demographic structure of the
country in a long run.
Note
that it will also affect the composition of the labour force, thus, social
policy, welfare strategies and program
can in the long run determine the average family size and demographic structure
of a country including that of its future labour force.
Visit www.researchshelf.com
for complete project materials, project topics, past examination questions and
answers, assignments, research proposals,
meet fellow students online, meet with lecturers and ask for help, read
and post news (Campus News). Registration is Free Of Charge (FOC).
Note also that our
mobile app will soon be launched where you can download it and view all the
above features on your mobile devices.
No comments:
Post a Comment