CHAPTER
I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Sustainable economic growth is a
major concern for any sovereign nation most especially the Less Developed
Countries (LDCs) which are characterized by low capital formation due to low
levels of domestic savings and investment (Adepoju, Salau and Obayelu, 2007).
It is expected that these Less Developed Countries (LDCs) when facing a
scarcity of capital would resort to borrowing from external sources so as to
supplement domestic saving (Aluko and Arowolo, 2010).
Soludo (2003) asserted that
countries borrow for two broad reasons; macroeconomic reason that is to finance
higher level of consumption and investment or to finance transitory balance of
payment deficit and avoid budget constraint so as to boost economic growth and
reduce poverty. The constant need for governments to borrow in order to finance
budget deficit has led to the creation of debt (Osinubi and Olaleru, 2006).
On the other hand, debt management is any strategy
that helps a debtor to repay or otherwise handle their debt better. Debt
management may involve working with creditors to restructure debt
or helping the debtor manage payments more effectively. A debtor may appeal to
a debt management company or special unit as in government to handle issues of
debt management.
Debt management, by the standard financial definition,
involves a designated third party assisting a debtor to repay his or her debt. Many companies specializing in credit
counseling offer plans to help people with heavy debt and damaged credit get
their financial situation under control. A simple definition could be the
routine practice of spending less than one earns (Ayadi & Ayadi, 2016).
For all intents and purposes, however, it is a
structured repayment plan set up by a designated order or as a result of
personal initiation. A plan to manage
debt entails a series of steps, which the third party service works on with the
help of the debtor. The first step typically involves compiling a list of all
creditor and the amounts owed to each.
Debt management refers to how debt is administered or
handled so as to avert/avoid adverse economic effects. Debt management is about
the debt policy designed to achieve certain objectives and actual’ implementation
of this policy (Nnamocha, 2012). Traditionally,
debt management consists of raising the necessary debt at the cheapest possible
interest rate cost, and paying such interest with ease in the earliest possible
time.
There are objectives of debt management. Debt
management now belongs to monetary policy as part of general macro-economic policy
of the state administered by the monetary authorities. Other objective of
management of debt is to keep the interest rate cost as low as possible. There
is also need to ensure that other macro-economic objective of the government,
like stabilization at economic growth etc.
However, generally is expected that developing
countries, facing a scarcity of capital, will acquired external debt to
supplement domestic saving (Aluko and Arowolo, 2010) Besides, external
borrowing is preferable to domestic debt because the interest rate charged by
international financial institutions like International Monetary Funds (IMF) is
about half to the one charged in the domestic Market (Pascal, 2010).
In any case, whether or not external debt would be
beneficial to the borrowing nation depends on whether the borrowed money is
used in the productive segments of the economy or consumption. Adepoju et
al., (2007), stated that, debt
financial investment need to be productive and well managed enough to earn a
rate at return higher than the cost of debt servicing.
The main lesson of the standard “growth with debt”
literature is that a country should borrow abroad as long as the capital thus acquired
produces a rate of return that is higher than the cost of borrowing country is
increasing its capacity and expanding output with the aid of foreign savings.
The debt, it property utilized is (Hameed et al., 2008) by producing a
multiplier adequate infrastructure base, a larger export terms of trade. But
this has never been the African countries where it has been misused (Aluko and
Arowolo, 2010). Apart from the fact that debt had been badly expended in these
countries, the management is usually in foreign exchange has also affected
their macro-economic performance (Aluko and Arowolo, 2010).
Prior to the 8 billion debt cancellation granted to Nigeria
in 2005 by the Paris club, the county had externs’ debt of close to 40 billion with
over 30 billion of the amount being owed to Paris Club alone (Semencatrious,
2015). The history at Nigeria huge debts can hardly be separated from its
decades of misrule and the continued recklessness of its rulers’.
Before the debt cancellation deal, Nigeria was to pay
a whopping sum of $4.9 billon every year on debt servicing (Aluko and Arowolo,
2010). It would have been impossible to achieve exchange rate stability or any
meaningful growth under such indebtedness. The effect of the Paris Club debt
cancellation was immediately observed in the sequential reduction of the
exchange rate of Nigeria via-s-vis the dollar from 130.6 naira in 2005 to 128.2
naira in 2006, and then 120.9 in 2007 (CBN, 2009). Although, the growth rate of
the economy has been inconsistent in the post-debt relief period as it plunged
from 6.5% in 2005 to 6% in 2006 and then increased to 6.5% in 2007 (CBN, 2008)
it could have been worse if the debt had not been cancelled.
Though management of national debt has to do with both
the external and domestic debts of a country. This paper will concentrate more
with external debt management investigating its effects on economic growth and
also to, evaluate the impact of external debt servicing has on the economic
growth of Nigeria and also to investigate its implication on the national
foreign reserves.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
“Huge debt does
not necessarily imply a slow economic growth; it is a nation’s inability to
manage or meet its debt service payments fueled by inadequate knowledge on the
nature, structure and magnitude of the debt in question” (Were, 2011).
It is no exaggeration that this is
the major challenge faced by the Nigerian economy. The inability of the
Nigerian economy to effectively manage or meet its debt servicing requirements
has exposed the nation to a high debt service burden. The resultant effect of
this debt service burden creates additional problems for the nation
particularly the increasing fiscal deficit which is driven by higher levels of
debt servicing. This poses a grave threat to the economy as a large chunk of
the nation’s hard earned revenue is being eaten up.
The huge amount of debt stock and debt service
payments of sub-saharan African countries and Nigeria in particular has prevented
the countries from embarking on larger volume of domestic investment, which
would have enhanced growth and development (Clement et al., 2013). Debt
became a burden to most African countries because contracted loans were not
optimally deployed therefore returns on investments were not adequate to meet
maturing obligations and did not leave a favourable balance to support domestic
economic growth.
Therefore, African economies have not performed well
because the necessary macro-economic adjustment has remained elusive for most
of the countries in the continent. It is against this background that this
study seeks to investigate debt management in
developing countries: A case study of Nigeria’s national debt.
Visit www.researchshelf.com
or call +2347069373637 for complete project materials, project topics, past
examination questions and answers, assignments, research proposals, meet fellow students online, meet with
lecturers and ask for help, read and post news (Campus News). Registration is
Free Of Charge (FOC).
Note also that
our mobile app will soon be launched where you can view all the above features
on your mobile devices and don’t forget to request for any material you need
that is not on our website through contact us page.
No comments:
Post a Comment