The Blog is a final Bus Stop for Academic Materials such as Assignments, Essays, Reports, Thesis, Projects, Dissertations Among others.

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

INFLUENCE OF MOTIVATION ON TEACHERS JOB PERFORMANCE IN SELECTED SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN OYO STATE.





CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK


2.1            Introduction

The role of motivation in every society or organization is to promote the performance of individual or workers in a work setting. Motivation is one of the elements of directing - to cause subordinates to act on the orders.  Directive is achieved through motivation. That is why motivation is complex and had attracted a lot of studies and more so, it is a vital approach to increasing productivity and performance (Adamu , 2007). In this chapter, related literature as this research study is concerned will be reviewed in the following sub-headings; Conceptual Framework,  Empirical Review, Theoretical Framework, Summary of Review.

2.2            Conceptual Framework


Many studies of motivation range from, Fedrick Taylor’s to Vroom’s expectancy, Douglas Mcgregor, Elton Mayo, Mc Cleland, Hertzberg, Abraham Maslow and many others.  To better understand the concept of motivation, it’s imperative for us to trace its origin. The word MOTIVATION” originated from latin word “MOVES” which means move in its literal meaning. Motivation is the process of arousing or attracting movement of individuals towards the realization of some set goals or targets (Andy, 2006).  


Thus, it is this movement that helps the individual to move towards personal goals or target of interest.  

Theories of motivation generally imply using one or two basic approaches for increasing employees’ performance; the first being the “extrinsic motivation of employee by means of an incentive programme. There are different types of extrinsic rewards; promotion, worker orientation, supervision etc., but the most common incentive is pay (Money) which can take many form such as salary and wages, bonuses, social welfare allowance, like housing, transport, medical, insurance, tax relief etc (Abdul, 2004).

 It may be claimed that, people work for money, but this simple link between work and money is deceptive. The role which money, a reward for work plays as a motivator of human behavior and performance, has been the subject of considerable research, and debate. But over time have changed as its relative importance.

Dawotola, (2008), said it is noticeable that financial incentive, are not necessarily the primary means of drawing the best out of the workers that individual workers are motivated by different things apart from money.


For many, opportunity such as inducements as high position for achievement, opportunity to use ability and other fringe benefit take precedence over high wages- as long as wages are adequate to provide a decent standard of living for the worker and his family. Thus the intrinsic aspects of a job alongside the operational conditions do affect job performance, and not necessarily the pay (Dawotola, 2008).

More so, in a market economy (like Nigeria), work and pay are inseparable. As
Emenike, (2010)  said, without money, people cannot buy the goods and service necessary for survival; they cannot advance in status in the eyes of their fellow men, nor can they make material improvement in their standard of living. Furthermore, money has consistently remained a sensitive and crucial element in employees’ rewards, and issues affecting pay and the likes are all capable of evoking very powerful emotions.

One may notice that the numbers of industrial disputes are largely expressed in term of pay. Fatayi, (2011) also noted that the discussion of money and motivation should not lead us to the conclusion that money is unimportant in the total process of motivating employee; it is important. However, according to two factor theory of motivation, money is a hygienic factor, not a motivator”.


 It can help sustain but not necessarily increase performance or productivity. Positive attitudes towards work arise from the job itself and function as motivators. These incidents are associated with feeling of self-improvement, achievement, and the desire for and acceptance of greater responsibility. The feelings generated are of a relatively long duration and result in increased performance.

Notwithstanding, in a developing country like Nigeria, Dawotola, (2008) said, pay in this environment, cannot be under-estimated in evoking strong emotional reaction.  This is due to the cultural pressure, economic demands, socio-political instability caused by the general state of high level of unemployment, diseases and poverty that has become a burden on the average Nigeria worker. Pay, indeed, do and can be effective motivation to performance.  This of course, does not necessary means job satisfaction; the employee works to fulfils his or basic and fundamentals needs for survival in an environment so volatile and so demanding.


2.2.1 The Motivational Process
It is relatively important to stress that the way and manner employees are motivated vary from organization to organization. It ranges from the incentives management provides to employees and the inter-personal relationship between management and employees, and between employees and their immediate superior officers (Humphrey, 2004).


The incentives given by different management to motivate their workers ranges from, bonus, free accident allowance, weekend allowance, transport allowance, housing allowance, overtime pay, entertainment allowance, advances, Loans etc..  The above are not only the incentives provided to motivate employees - there are many others and does not mean that all organizations provide all these incentives to their employees because each organization has its own form of incentives.
Incentives provided are not the only things that can motivate employees in task accomplishment in an organization but again the relationship between superior officers and subordinates or employees and the management matters a lot.

2.2.2 The Importance of Motivation
The research of Elton Mayo has been regarded as crucial to the success or failure of organization. A manager/administrator needs to attract people into the organization, maintain them and stimulate them to achieve the organizational goals. Once employee morale is high, it means he/she has been motivated. According to Gallan, G (2003), the importance of motivation in an organization cannot be under estimated. Motivation attracts and sustains people in an organization. People must be attracted (motivated) to join an organization and stay within.


It is a vital ingredient for an organization to attain a high level of efficiency and performance which is one of the major goals in any organization.

2.2.3 Factors that Enhance Performance
Gollymore,  (2006), vehemently believed that materials motivation like money and fringe benefits cannot on the entirety induce employee to achieve a desire performance level. What need to be done by the management is to identify the employees’ needs, work towards satisfying those needs and at the same time creating conducive atmosphere for employees to perform effectively and efficiently.
The factors that enhance employees’ performance are as follows:-
1.     The challenging nature of the job.
2.     Adequate interaction with co-workers.
3.     Recognition of one’s performance in the organization.
4.     Desires for achievement at work
5.     Possibilities of personal growth and development.
6.     The free flow of communication between superior and subordinate employees
7.     Employees participation in managerial decision.


8.     Re-designing jobs to allow employees for greater challenges and broader range of participation in the organizational activities.
9.     Conducive atmosphere for work
10.                        Better welfare packages for the employees.


2.3  Empirical Studies

Organizations tend to focus efforts of individual workers on meeting specifically planned goals. Planning in a sound manner is therefore considered a crucial exercise that offers to provide a clear roadmap for realizing organizational accomplishments, (Kanayo, 2012).

Focusing on factors influencing  institutions Gollymore (2006) observed that institutions that rarely pay serious attention on motivation of their workforce definitely fail the productivity test. Such schools hardly retain their teaching force should lucrative opportunities get sported.

Studying the level of productivity of employees in private sector firms in third world counties, John, (2011), noted that many private owned institutions and business venture were doing relatively well, contributing approximately more than 60% of the G.D.P. It was observed that these organizations were able to offer a conductive atmosphere for workers to perform their best.

From the survey based on factors influencing productivity of workers in the education sector in Brazil, Douglas (2004) discovered that productivity corresponds to the cumulative performance of individual employees.


In the same document, it is argued that since every teacher attaches a lot of substantial and sustainable livelihood from organizations, their efforts to perform assigned tasks are always in tandem with obtained benefits. According to Dorothy (2004), management of organizations should not expect a lot from employees by giving little in return. In the work, it is suggested that an internal system should be established in institutions that measures employee productivity and indicates equivalent monetary rewards.

Employee productivity entails several aspects such as increased efforts to achieve high output, innovation to discover new superior ways of doing things, enhanced attitudes to treat customers with respect and the overall profit obtained by an organization, (Mayuwa, 2011). It is acknowledged that organizations that emphasizes on motivating workers are ones whose paths to profitability are predictable to the satisfaction of all key stakeholders. Resources which an organization invests in its operations equally determine the extent to which it attains its objectives.



Generally, an organization that is keen on enhancing employee performance must begin this journey by enhancing the working environment before subsequently considering other factors of work execution. Most employees of organizations derive a feeling of recognition and self- worth when working in an environment they will not shy to show off to other people even low (Nanny, 2012).

Employee performance acts as the pressure point that powers the system of an organization such that if the performance is low, the organizational systems also tend to their lows and vice versa. It is advisable to invest in human capital since a pool of competencies is a superior strategy for increasing organizational, (Odari, 2010).
Visit www.researchshelf.com for complete project materials, project topics, past examination questions and answers, assignments, research proposals,  meet fellow students online, meet with lecturers and ask for help, read and post news (Campus News). Registration is Free Of Charge (FOC).
Note also that our mobile app will soon be launched where you can download it and view all the above features on your mobile devices. 

No comments:

Post a Comment