For
questions and answers, email theotherwomaninmarriage@gmail.com
NATURE AND PURPOSE OF
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT
Management Accounting is the application of
professional knowledge and skill in the preparation and presentation of
accounting information in such a way as to assist management in the formulation
of policies in planning and control of the undertaking.
Management accounting is concerned with identifying,
presenting and interpreting information used for planning and control of an
enterprise operation.
Management accounting involves data gathering,
analyzing, processing, interpreting and communicating the reporting information
for effective planning decision marking and operations.
Management accounting uses data from the financial
and cost accounting systems and Statistics.
Management accounting also uses statistics and operations research for
analysis.
Management accounting produces information: which
is relevant for the intended purpose.
Management accounting is concerned with helping management to run a
business efficiently.
Purpose of
Management Accounting
The main Purpose of management accounting is the
provision of information used for:
a. Formulating
strategy
b. Planning
and controlling activities
c. Decision
making
d. Optimization
use of resources
e. Disclosure
to shareholders and employees
f.
Safeguarding the assets
Management accounting compared with financial
accounting and cost account. Financial
accounting is concerned with stewardship function. The emphasis is on financial record-keeping
and preparation of financial accounts whereas management accounting provides
information that is useful to the manager of an organization in taking
decisions within the scope of their managerial responsibility. Therefore, the main difference between
management accounting and financial accounting lies in their purpose; financial
accounting is for stewardship purpose while management accounting is
essentially for internal purpose.
Management accounting and cost accounting are closely related.
There is no realistic guideline between cost
accounting, management accounting with regard to the provisions of information
for planning and control. Cost
accounting is concerned with the provision of information about costs while
management accounting uses this information to plan, control or provide
problem-solving analyzes. Therefore cost
accounting is the essential foundation for the development of management
accounting system.
In general, management accounting is wider in scope
and uses more advanced techniques than cost accounting. A fundamental requirement for management
accounting is the existence of a sound costing system to provide basic data.
Management accounting is activity base and is
concerned mainly with the present, the future and sometimes the past. Cost and management accounting provide an
internal information system to assist the planning and control decisions by
managers.
Financial, cost and management accounting from past
of the financial information system of an organization and in many enterprises,
the various facets are totally integrated with no artificial divisions between
them.
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING AS A TOOL
OF MANAGEMENT
Managers must be properly informed in order to
carry out their responsibility for planning and controlling the resources of a
business. Thus management accounting as
a tool of management is management information system which analyzes past,
present and future data to fit the variety of different problems confronting
managers.
Management accounting ensures that there is effective:
a.
Formulation of plans to meet objectives
b.
Formulation of short term operational plans
c.
Acquisition and the finance
d.
Communication of financial and operating
information
e.
Corrective action to bring plans and results
into line
f.
Reviewing and reporting on systems and
operations.
Evolution of
Management Accounting
Management accounting evolved out of industrial
revolution and the challenges of modern business to meet the dynamic nature of
environmental and industrial conditions.
Management accounting starts from where cost accounting stopped.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
a.
Financial Accounting is regulated by law while
management accounting is not e.g. CAMA 1990
b. Financial
Accounting is for external and internal use while management Accounting is for
management internal use.
c. Management
Accounting is future oriented while financial accounting is past oriented
d. Management
accounting reports are generated when the need arises while financial
accounting reports is prepared periodically e.g. yearly.
e. Financial
accounting report follow a prescribed format while that of management
accounting do not
SHORT TERM
ACCOUNTING DECISION
Introduction:
Decision making is the process of choosing among
alternative courses of action. Decisions
are usually taken through all process of managerial functions.
Decision making is an all round activity taken
place at every level in the organization.
The decision process consists of:
i.
Definition of objective
ii.
Consideration of alternatives
iii.
Evaluation of alternatives in the light of the
objectives
iv.
Selection of the course of action. Decision making is based on both quantitative
and qualitative factors. Management
accounting supplies information for decision making purposes both for long and
short terms.
Short term accounting decision criteria
are usually based on marginal costing, cost-volume-profit analysis,
differential cost and opportunity costs.
Information
for Decision – Making
Management makes decision about the future. When they make decision for economic or
financial reasons, the objective is usually to increase profitability or value
of the business, or to reduce cost and improve productivity.
When managers make a decision, they make a choice
between different possible courses of action (option), and they need relevant
and reliable information about the probable financial consequences of different
options available. A function of management
accounting is to provide information to help managers to make decision, by providing
estimates of the consequences of selecting any option.
Traditionally, cost and management accounting
information was derived from historical cost (a measurement). For example, historical costs are used to
assess the profitability of products, and control reporting typically involves
a comparison of actual historical costs with a budget or standard cost and
revenues.
-
Decisions affect the future, but cannot change
what has already happened
-
Decision-making should therefore look at the
future consequences of a decision, and should not be influenced by historical
even and historical costs.
-
Decisions should consider what can be changed in
the future. They should not be
influenced by what will happen in the future that is unavoidable, possibly due
to the commitments that have been made in the past.
-
Economic
or financial decisions should be based on future cash flows, not future
accounting measurements of cost or profit.
Accounting conventions, such as the accruals concepts of accounting and
their depreciation of non-current assets, do not reflect economic reality. Cash flow, on the other hand, do reflect the
economic reality of decisions. Managers
should therefore consider the effect that their decisions will have on future
cash flows, not reported accounting profits.
Marginal
Costing and Decision –making
Marginal costing might be used for
decision-making. For example, marginal costing
is used for limiting factor analysis and linear programming.
It is appropriate to use marginal costing for
decision-making when it can be assumed that future fixed costs will be the
same, no matter what decision is taken, and that all variable costs represent
future cash flows that will be incurred as a consequence of any decision that
is taken.
These assumptions about fixed variable costs are
not always valid. When they are not
valid, relevant costs should be used to evaluate the economic/financial
consequences of a decision.
RELEVANT
COSTS AND DECISION-MAKING
Relevant costs should be used for assessing the
economic or financial consequences of a decision.
The key concepts in this definition of relevant
costs are as follows:



Terms used
in relevant costing
Several terms are used in relevant costing, to
indicate how certain costs might be relevant or not relevant to a
decision.
Incremental
Cost
An incremental cost is an additional cost that will
occur if a particular decision is taken.
Provided that this additional cost is a cash flow, an incremental cost
is a relevant cost.
Differential
Cost
A differential cost is the amount by which future
costs will be different, depending on which course of action is taken. A differential cost is therefore an amount by
which future costs will be higher or lower, if a particular course of action is
chose. Provided that this additional
cost is a cash flow, a differential cost is a relevant cost.
Avoidable
and unavoidable costs
An avoidable cost is a cost that could be saved
(avoided), depending whether or not a particular decision is taken. An
unavoidable cost is a cost that will be incurred anyway.
-
Avoidable costs are relevant costs
-
Unavoidable costs are not relevant to a
decision.
Committed
Cost
Committed costs are a category of unavoidable
costs. A committed cost is a cost that a
company has already committed to or an obligation already made, that it cannot
avoid by any means. Committed costs are
not relevant costs for decision making.
Sunk Cost
Sunk costs are costs that have already been
incurred (historical costs) or costs that have already been committed by an
earlier decision. Sunk costs must be ignored for the purpose of evaluating a
decision, and cannot be relevant costs.
Opportunity
Costs
Relevant costs can also be measured as an
opportunity cost. An opportunity cost is
a benefit that will be lost by taking one course of action instead of the
next-most profitable course of action.
IDENTIFYING
RELEVANT COSTS
There are certain rules or guidelines that might
help to identify the relevant costs for evaluating any management decision.
Relevant
Cost of Materials
The relevant costs of a decision to do some work or
make a product will usually include costs of materials. Relevant costs of materials are the
additional cash flows that will be incurred (or benefits that will be lost) by
using the materials for the purpose that is under consideration. If none of the required materials are
currently held as inventory, the relevant cost is the cash that will have to be
paid to acquire and use the materials.
Note that the historical cost of materials held in inventory cannot be the
relevant cost of the materials, because their historical cost is a sunk
cost. The relevant costs of materials
can be described as their “deprival value”.
The deprival value of materials is the benefit or value that would be
lost if the company were deprived of the materials currently held in inventory.
-
If the materials are regularly used, their
deprival value is the cost of having to buy more units of the material to
replace them (their replacement cost)
-
If the materials are not in regular use, their
deprival value is either the net benefit that would be lost because they cannot
be disposed of (their net disposal or scrap value) or the benefits obtainable
from any alternative use.
In an examination question, materials in inventory
might not be in regular use, but could be used as a substitute material in some
other work. Their deprival value might
therefore be the purchase cost of another material that could be avoided by
using the materials held in inventory as a substitute.
Relevant
Cost of Labour
The relevant costs of a decision to do some work or
make a product will usually include costs of labour. The relevant cost of labour for any decision
is the additional cash expenditure (or saving) that will arise as a direct
consequence of the decision.
If the cost of labour is a variable cost, and labour
is not in restricted supply, the relevant cost of the labour is its variable
cost.
If labour is a fixed cost and there is spare labour
time available, the relevant cost of using labour is zero. The spare time would otherwise be paid for
idle time, and there is no additional cash cost of using the labour to do extra
work.
Relevant
Cost of Overheads
Relevant costs of expenditure that might be classed
as overhead costs should be identified by applying the normal rules of relevant
costing. Relevant costs are future cash flows that will arise as a direct
consequence of making a particular decision.
Fixed Overhead Absorption Rates are therefore
irrelevant, because fixed overhead absorption is not overhead expenditure and
does not represent cash spending.
However, it might be assumed that the overhead absorption rate for
variable overheads is a measure of actual cash spending on variable overheads.
It is therefore often appropriate to treat a variable overhead hourly rate as a
relevant cost, because it is an estimate of cash spending per hours for each
additional hour worked.
The only overhead fixed costs that are relevant
costs for a decision are extra cash spending that will be incurred, or cash
spending that will be saved, as a direct
consequence of making the decision.
Email me your assignments and I will send you back the solutions.
ReplyDeleteIn addition to solving problems I do projects, papers and essays.
I offer assistance in the following areas, undergraduate, graduate and post graduate levels:
Accounting
Accounting concept
Income statement
Balance sheet
Cash-flow statement
Accounts receivable, Note receivable
Inventory
Fixed Assets, Depreciation
Intangible assets
Current liability
Bond
Long-term liability
Common and preferred stock
Treasury stock
Cash and dividends
Financial statement analysis
Cost accounting, Cost analysis
Accounting and management decision
Budgeting
prashant8778@yahoo.co.in